This theory seems impossible and absurd when you first set your eyes on it. "How can magic be true?" you'd probably be thinking. "Magic is just something that people do to trick you!". But, there may actually be some proof of this.
Scientists claim that the Big Bang theory is the best theory that anyone in history has ever thought up of. But, there is an obvious problem. The closest scientists can get to saying how the universe started from is that a tiny squashed ball of matter just exploded and formed the universe. What they can't explain is where the matter came from. As tiny as it is, it had to come from somewhere. This is where the greatest minds on Earth have failed. Nobody in recorded history has come up with an idea as to how the matter appeared suddenly, out of nowhere. Thus magic may actually, have one, small laugh at science. Why? Magic, religion and everything else claims that solid matter can appear from absolutely nothing. This may mean that magic, as weird as it seems, may be able to explain the mystery of the beginning of the Big Bang.
Even if magic may be able to explain this infamous mystery, we will not know what actually kick started the universe. Hopefully, you will be able to explain your ideas about this.
(please write your ideas about this topic in the comments box)
Monday, August 24, 2009
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Weird Topic: Common sense
Common sense is a weird thing, isn't it? It's weird because common sense has no true meaning. How is this true?
Think of it like this. What would you think about drinking poison? You'd probably say: "are you nuts? Poison is obviously bad for you!" But, what would a different animal think about this? They'd probably say "Well, duh, poison for humans=paradise!". This is because while people think poison is bad for themselves, it's good for other animals. Common sense is basically something that a half-crazed person thought of, something that grew and grew until people thought that it was the right thing to do. Common sense is actually related to your opinion. Even if you think that common sense is always the right thing, it's actually not as simple as you think.
Basically, what is common sense?
(start a discussion in the comment page about this topic)
Think of it like this. What would you think about drinking poison? You'd probably say: "are you nuts? Poison is obviously bad for you!" But, what would a different animal think about this? They'd probably say "Well, duh, poison for humans=paradise!". This is because while people think poison is bad for themselves, it's good for other animals. Common sense is basically something that a half-crazed person thought of, something that grew and grew until people thought that it was the right thing to do. Common sense is actually related to your opinion. Even if you think that common sense is always the right thing, it's actually not as simple as you think.
Basically, what is common sense?
(start a discussion in the comment page about this topic)
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Aung San Suu Kyi
The Burmese government is, extremely pathetic in their attempts to hold their preciously, and certainly doomed government. Why is it like that? It all starts with the arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Aung San Suu Kyi's detention is, in fact, a huge mistake made by Burma's military junta. Obviously, their motive was to prevent the downfall of their goverment, which is certainly imminent, as, who would want a bunch of nutjobs running the goverment (nobody in the right mind would). Instead of preventing the downfall of their government, they have already secured the government's downfall. Since Dr. Suu Kyi already has been supported by 59% of the voters in the general election, it adds the the controversy, as it attracts international intrest. It was certainly a wise decision to impose sanctions on the country. The only problem is that, the military junta may decide to put Aung San into more misery if the U.N try to intervene. The accusations against Aung San Suu Kyi, such as being "an axehandle of neo-colonists" and "a traitor who deserves to be deported" is one of the desperate excuses of the government to the world to defend themselves against inquestionable evidence that they are responsible for handling something that is extremely close to being inhumane (probably it already is). Basically, the government is scared of political powers such as U.S.A and other major countries, so it is trying to hide the fact that somebody is rebelling against their corrupt system, by simply dumping her into house arrest with a hastily thought of 'answer'. Talks with these people are useless. Why try talk to a military junta? It only premotes their reputation making them even more dangerous
Please post your opinions on this subject and on others in this blog page.
(Aung San Suu Kyi is not corrupt as she has earned a Noble Peace prize)
Aung San Suu Kyi's detention is, in fact, a huge mistake made by Burma's military junta. Obviously, their motive was to prevent the downfall of their goverment, which is certainly imminent, as, who would want a bunch of nutjobs running the goverment (nobody in the right mind would). Instead of preventing the downfall of their government, they have already secured the government's downfall. Since Dr. Suu Kyi already has been supported by 59% of the voters in the general election, it adds the the controversy, as it attracts international intrest. It was certainly a wise decision to impose sanctions on the country. The only problem is that, the military junta may decide to put Aung San into more misery if the U.N try to intervene. The accusations against Aung San Suu Kyi, such as being "an axehandle of neo-colonists" and "a traitor who deserves to be deported" is one of the desperate excuses of the government to the world to defend themselves against inquestionable evidence that they are responsible for handling something that is extremely close to being inhumane (probably it already is). Basically, the government is scared of political powers such as U.S.A and other major countries, so it is trying to hide the fact that somebody is rebelling against their corrupt system, by simply dumping her into house arrest with a hastily thought of 'answer'. Talks with these people are useless. Why try talk to a military junta? It only premotes their reputation making them even more dangerous
Please post your opinions on this subject and on others in this blog page.
(Aung San Suu Kyi is not corrupt as she has earned a Noble Peace prize)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)